收音机爱好者吧 关注:66,676贴子:4,796,870
  • 3回复贴,共1

来来来,跟我一起过过眼瘾

取消只看楼主收藏回复




松下RF9000,限量全球500台的尤物,目前价格1W刀左右的“机皇”,一起过过眼瘾吧。
Many thanks to SWLing Post contributor, Dan Robinson, who writes:
Appearing on the Japanese Buyee website is this RF-9000, which was the “King of Radios” of the heavy multiband “portable” era.
In recent years, RF-9000s in excellent to LNIB condition have sold for $10,000 or more.
A tour d’force of technology in its day, the 9000 featured room-filling main speakers and PLL technology that was advanced for its time.
The shortwave receiver section of the 9000 was plagued by PLL artifacts which prevented the radio from achieving what it could have had this problem not been solved in advance by Panasonic engineers.
A LNIB RF-9000 that I purchased for near $5,000 sold to a Hong Kong collector for $10,000 a few years ago. While I do miss its amazing FM quality and looks, the receiver ultimately lagged behind others, such as the SONY CRF-330K and 320 in performance.
The asking price for this 9000, which appears to have cosmetic issues, is in my view high.
非常感谢SWLing Post的贡献者Dan Robinson,他写道:
在日本Buyee网站上出现的这款RF-9000,曾是重低音多波段“便携”时代的“收音机之王”。
近年来,状况极佳至近全新(LNIB)的RF-9000售价高达1万美元或更多。
在其时代,9000是一款技术上的杰作,配备了能充满整个房间的主扬声器,以及当时先进的锁相环(PLL)技术。
9000的短波接收部分受PLL伪像困扰,这使得收音机未能达到其应有的水平,而如果松下工程师事先解决了这个问题,情况本可以不同。
几年前,我以近5000美元的价格购买的一台近全新RF-9000,卖给了香港一位收藏家,售价为1万美元。虽然我确实怀念它出色的FM音质和外观,但该接收机在性能上最终落后于其他机型,例如索尼CRF-330K和CRF-320。
这款9000似乎存在一些外观问题,我认为其标价过高。


IP属地:江苏1楼2025-09-29 13:31回复
    这位鲁滨逊先生的留言中透漏他的个人观点:
    1、RF-9000短波镜像干扰问题没有解决。
    2、接收性能落后于同时期SONY CRF-320\330。
    我不确认他所说性能是不是指短波接收性能。
    对于收藏者来说,以上可能都不是首要考虑的问题吧,稀缺性可能才是。
    对于我们爱好者来说,看看就行了,没必要大笔的钱买台这个供着。


    IP属地:江苏2楼2025-09-29 13:37
    回复
      2026-04-28 02:55:28
      广告
      不感兴趣
      开通SVIP免广告
      I actually just bought a RF-9000 from a Spanish Ebay seller. It might show up in the ‘completed auctions’, not sure. I made an offer of 2,000 Euros and he accepted. Of course I am like most of you who might have seen one in a magazine or book for over 20 years, but never dreamed of actually owning one.
      My unit had a few imperfections like a couple of dings and the grille was not 100% with some slight discoloration but I cleaned it up nicely and got some Testors paint to fill in the dings. It came with the cover but with no documentation. Everything works perfectly and there are no dirty or inoperable switches or buttons. Even the lights all work which is a relief.
      I can only really compare it to the Sony ICF-2010 and the Satellit 700, both of which I have owned at one time. I still have the Sony. The Panasonic is on a much different level as far as ease of use. And the tuning is super fast with absolutely no audio lag between channels if that is the right description. It is really smooth sailing all the way across the dial and you can go straight from FM into the LW band which is pretty cool.
      Another nice feature is the band selection buttons actually have the corresponding frequencies also so there is no guesswork. The odd thing about the unit is that all of those cool buttons that you see pertain mainly to the clock and timer functions.
      The shortwave side is fairly stripped down with just a 3-way bandwidth selector, a switch for a noise blanker, a RF gain knob, and a 4 position switch for USB, LSB, etc. That is pretty much it for tuning and knob twiddling and I would had preferred to have a few more knobs for antenna trim and other features to eek out faint signals. I guess I was expecting more I don’t know?
      I personally find it to be the best radio I have ever used as far as audio and ease of use. I did some side by side tests against the ICF-2010 for sensitivity and it is about a wash. But for 1/10 the price the Sony wins all day long and you cant beat the sync detector! I find myself amazed that I would ever own a RF-9000 and consider it a great investment. I think this seller is dreaming if he thinks he can get that price for it though.
      我其实刚从西班牙的eBay卖家那里买了一台RF-9000。它可能会出现在“已完成拍卖”中,我不确定。我出价2000欧元,他接受了。当然,我和你们大多数人一样,可能在20多年前的杂志或书籍上见过它,但从未想过真的能拥有一个。我的这台机器有一些小瑕疵,比如有几个凹痕,格栅也不是100%完好,有些轻微的变色,但我把它清理得很干净,还用Testors油漆填补了凹痕。它附带了盖子,但没有说明书。一切功能都完美运行,没有脏污或无法操作的开关和按钮。就连灯光也都正常工作,这让人松了一口气。我只能真正把它和我曾经拥有过的索尼ICF-2010以及Satellit 700进行比较。我仍然保留着那台索尼。
      与索尼相比,松下的这款在易用性方面要高得多。调谐速度非常快,如果那是正确的描述的话,频道之间完全没有音频延迟。整个频率范围内的操作都非常顺畅,你可以直接从FM切换到LW波段,这真的很酷。另一个不错的功能是频段选择按钮上还有对应的频率,所以不需要猜测。这台机器奇怪的地方在于,你看到的所有那些酷炫的按钮主要与时钟和定时器功能有关。短波部分相当简化,只有三档带宽选择器、一个噪声消除开关、一个射频增益旋钮,以及一个用于USB、LSB等的四档开关。这就是调谐和旋钮调节的全部内容,我本来希望有更多的旋钮用于天线调谐和其他功能,以捕捉微弱信号。我想我可能期望更多吧?我不知道。
      我个人认为,就音质和易用性而言,这是我用过的最好的收音机。我针对灵敏度对它和ICF-2010做过一些并排测试,结果差不多。但考虑到价格只是索尼的十分之一,松下完胜,而且同步检波器也无法比拟!我发现自己惊讶于自己竟然拥有一台RF-9000,并认为它是一项伟大的投资。不过,我认为这位卖家如果以为能卖到那个价格,那是在做梦。


      IP属地:江苏3楼2025-09-29 13:44
      收起回复



        IP属地:江苏4楼2025-09-29 13:47
        回复