核心其实应该是骑马步兵==

搬板凳来学习

我问一个问题，倭马亚朝扩张时期兵力一般3-5万，入侵西班牙的1.5万，为什么攻打君士坦丁堡就那么多人？好像杜普伊也是这么说（具体记不清了）。

虽然看不懂在说什么，但是好厉害的样子……

一般是2-3万顶天了==
攻打君堡的人数一是用的拜占庭记载，二来即使记载确实，也包含了大量桨手、水手

各位继续吵用力吵，本教已经加精了内

以上文字说明一个问题，阿拉伯军队确实倚仗步兵，但步兵多是白白辅助兵，骑兵依旧由“真”阿拉伯人构成，没提是否阿拉伯人的主体是骑兵，但说明了一个问题，ysl早期征服倚仗步兵和alb人的军队主体是骑兵并没有太大冲突，即有阿拉伯人构成的骑兵，又有白白人的步兵，这才是伊斯兰军队的构成方式

我的书是dark age armies，你是引这本，我这本出版年份是在80年代中期，他反复强调了真“arab”，算了，说这些没用，都是二手资料，我们没法读阿拉伯文原始的资料，鬼知道这些二手资料错了多少

Umayyad professional forces had changed considerably since the dynasty took over the caliphate following the initial wave of Arab-Islamic expansion in the mid-7th century AD. Although a significant role was still played by infantry archers and javelin throwers, most troops were now mounted infantry. Arab cavalry were still armed with spears and swords, rather than being horse-archers, but had learned much from their Iranian, Turkish and to a lesser extent Byzantine opponents. The Berbers and Germanic.
Such Berber tribal forces included substantial numbers of unarmoured light
cavalry and were almost certainly capable of fielding a larger proportion of
cavalry than the Arabs.
当然这只是David Nicolle在Poitiers AD 732一书中的观点
另外关于Poitiers，这一仗史料实在少得可怜，各本书之间大相径庭也很正常